We Are Taught About Liberal And Conservative Bias In Media, But Not United States Empire Bias by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!
(2023-07-30 at 19:07:08 )

We Are Taught About Liberal And Conservative Bias In Media, But Not United States Empire Bias by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):

One of the biggest problems with the urgent push for "media literacy" we have been seeing in the west these last few years is that everyone is being taught about liberal bias and conservative bias in media, but they are not being taught about United States empire bias.

Your average western news media consumer will have some general awareness that Fox News has a conservative bias and MSNBC has a liberal bias, and if you try to use one of them to prove a political point to someone of the opposing ideology they will probably hasten to inform you of the biased nature of your source.

A somewhat smaller but still very large percentage of the population will be aware that an outlet like RT is going to have a bias in favor of the Russian government, and if you try to cite RT to prove some point about Ukraine or whatever you will probably get called out on that right away.

That is about as far as "media literacy" goes among the general public in the western world, which just so happens to work out very nicely in favor of the western empire. The radius of awareness extends just far enough to pose no threat to the empires information interests, and stops there.

Caitlin Johnstone: 15 Reasons Why Media Do Not Do Journalism-Consortium News (Consortiumnews) June 5, 2023

What relatively few westerners are aware of is that the entirety of mainstream western media - both liberal and conservative - are so biased in favor of the United States and its empire-like global sphere of influence that they are almost worthless for forming an accurate understanding of what is happening in the world.

Every foreign policy agenda of the United States and its allies is reliably facilitated by the western media, because the western media do not exist primarily to report the news, they exist primarily to administer propaganda.

The New York Times has reliably supported every war the United States has waged. Western mass media focus overwhelmingly on foreign protests against governments the United States dislikes while paying far less attention to widespread protests against United States-aligned governments.

The only time Donald Trump was universally showered with praise by the mass media was when he bombed Syria, while the only time Joe Biden has been universally slammed by the mass media was when he withdrew from Afghanistan.

United States media did such a good job deceitfully marrying Saddam Hussein to the September 11, 2001 attacks in the minds of the public in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq that seven in ten Americans still believed he was connected to 9-11-01 months after the war began. To name just a few obvious glaring examples of far too many to list.

Kids are not being taught about this type of bias in school. Websites like AllSides and Media Bias-Fact Check set up to help improve "media literacy" and teach people about media biases focus only on biases of ideological partisanship, not international conflicts and foreign policy.

You have probably seen charts like this one from the Media Bias section of the AllSides website, where the biases of outlets are ranked from "Left" to "Center" to "Right":

What you have never seen anywhere is a chart that ranks outlets in terms of how sympathetic they are to the United States-centralized empire, with outlets like The New York Times, The Guardian and Fox News being listed on the extreme end of one side and more United States-critical outlets like Consortium News, Mintpress News and Antiwar toward the other side.

Notice how the above chart is so completely uninterested in foreign policy that it lists militarist smut rag The Atlantic in the same category as outlets that are often critical of United States foreign policy like Jacobin and The Nation.

Here is what the Media Bias-Fact Check profile on my (currently malfunctioning) website looks like as of this writing:

It places me on the far left ideologically, which is of course fair, but it does not tell you anything about my attitude toward the United States and its allies, which consumes a huge amount of my focus and commentary.

Am I one of those "yay NATO" lefties or am I a "boo NATO" lefty? Am I one of those lefties who focuses on domestic issues and pretends foreign policy does not exist? In international conflicts do I tend to side with the United States, side with some other government, remain neutral, or some mixture of the above? It does not say.

It does not say for anyone else either. The New York Times is listed as having a "left-center bias" with a credibility rating of "high". The New York Post is listed as having a "center-right" bias with a "mixed" credibility rating. It is all about where they can be placed on the left-to-right ideology scale and some arbitrary determination about how "credible" they are found to be, without any mention of the fact that they are both fiercely loyal to the United States empire.

This is entirely by design. The whole push to promote "media literacy" and improve online information has never actually been about training people to see and understand the biases of media outlets, it has been about training people not to see and understand them. At least not where it matters.

Foreign policy is the single most consequential aspect of government behavior when it comes to the United States and its allies, because it affects the most people to the greatest degree.

Domestic policy has very real consequences for the kind of life people will have under the United States power alliance, but you are talking about questions like whether they will be able to afford healthcare or purchase legal cannabis, not whether they will be bombed, starved by crushing economic sanctions, or killed in a nuclear war. And yet our entire society is being trained not to look there when determining the biases of the sources we look to for information.

And this is exactly because foreign policy is so immensely consequential. Those who run the empire do not care whether women can have an abortion or whether marginalized groups are abused by police, so they are happy for the biases of their propaganda organs to be highlighted on such matters and for everyone to pour all their energy into debating them.

What they absolutely do care about a very great deal is the operation of the globe-spanning empire, which is held together by nonstop violence and abuse and the threat thereof.

So we are indoctrinated into supporting the United States empires agendas of war, militarism, manipulation and resource extraction around the world, and we are trained not to look at the fact that we are being indoctrinated by sources of information who are all wildly biased in favor of that empire.

Most Propaganda Looks Nothing Like This

The overwhelming majority of domestic propaganda in the west is not the glaring Saddam-has-WMDs variety, it is those mundane, routine deceptions they feed us from day to day to bind us to the mainstream worldview.-
Caitlin Johnstone (caitoz) May 28, 2023

By keeping the western medias United States empire bias out of the spotlight, imperial spinmeisters shrink the Overton window of acceptable opinion down to those foreign policy views which are promoted by mainstream information sources whose only criticisms of the empire come down to minor quibbles about the specifics of how the empire should be run, instead of whether a globe-spanning power structure should exist at all.

This is just one of the many sly little ways our perception of our world is tilted toward the interests of our rulers. It is what Chomsky was talking about when he said, "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum - even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there is free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate."

A passive and obedient populace is exactly what the empire wants, so the imperial media keep the debate restricted to things like culture war issues and electoral politics, with the edges of the Overton window eclipsing out issues like capitalism, militarism, oligarchy and empire!

In this way we are kept barking and snarling at each other, without ever turning our gaze upon our rulers, and without ever noticing how many more there are of us there are than of them!!

"This Ms Caitlin Johnstone article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Thanks for reading!!

Everyone has my unconditional permission to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I have written) in any way they like free of charge.

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following my antics on Twitter, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, purchasing some of my "sweet merchandise", buying my new book "Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone", or my previous book "Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers". The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for "my website", which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I am trying to do with this platform, "click here".

Ah, the Buddha Ms Caitlin speaks the truth!!! - Cousin Lucky