The Unspoken Elephant in the Room of Netanyahus Intent in Gaza by Alastair Crooke!
(2023-11-13 at 22:09:06 )

The Unspoken Elephant in the Room of Netanyahus Intent in Gaza by Alastair Crooke!

Is this punishment on Gazas civilian population, prompted by desire for vengeance? Or is it an outpouring of eschatological rage and determination?

The point about the Gaza crisis is that should everyone agree to stick their head in the sand and ignore the "elephant in the room", it is easy enough so to do. The meaning to a severe crisis is only properly understood when someone notices "the elephant", and says look out; there is an elephant stamping here. That is where we are today. Slowly, the West is beginning to take notice. The rest of world however, is transfixed by it, and is being transformed by it.

What is the "elephant" (or elephants) in the room? Blinkens recent regional diplomacy was "a bust". None of the regional leaders that Blinken met would talk further about Gaza beyond demanding stridently, "no Palestinian population displacement into Egypt" a "stop to this madness" - the carpet bombing of Gazans - and the demand for an immediate ceasefire.

And President Bidens calls for a "pause" - softly, at first, and the more strident now - is being bluntly ignored by the Israeli government. The spectre of President Carters impotence during the Iran hostage crisis hangs ever more soberly in the backdrop.

The truth is that the White House cannot force Israel to do its will - the Israeli lobby holds the more clout in Congress than any White House team. Thus, "no exit" from the Israeli crisis is readily to be seen. Biden "made his bed" with the Netanyahu cabinet and must live with the consequences.

Impotence then, as the Democratic Party fractures beyond the simplistic division between centrists versus progressives. The polarisation emanating from the "no ceasefire stance" is having stark destabilising effects on politics, both in the United States and Europe.

Impotence then, as the shape of the Middle East crystallises into sharp antagonism towards the Wests perceived accommodation of the mass slaughter of Palestinian women, children and civilians. The die may be too far "cast" to brake the ongoing tectonic reset already underway. Western double standards are just too inescapably obvious now to the Global Majority.

The large "elephant" is this: Israel has dropped more than 25,000 tons of high explosives since 7 October (the 1945 Hiroshima nuke was 15,000 tons equivalent). What exactly is Netanyahu and his war cabinets aim here?

Ostensibly, the earlier military operation in Jabalia Camp was about targeting a Hamas leader suspected of lurking under the camp - but six 2,000 lb bombs for one Hamas "target" in a crowded refugee camp? And why too the attacks on water cisterns, hospital solar energy panels and hospital entrances, roads, schools and bakeries?

Bread has almost disappeared in Gaza. The United Nations says all bakeries in northern Gaza have closed following the bombing of the last bakeries. Clean water is desperately short, and thousands of bodies are slowly decomposing under rubble. Disease and epidemic are appearing, whilst humanitarian supplies are being tightly restricted as a bargaining tool toward further hostage releases..

Editor of Haaretz, Aluf Benn, puts the Israeli strategy very plainly:

"The expulsion of the Palestinian residents, transformation of their homes into piles of construction rubble, and the restriction of the entry of supplies and fuel into Gaza are the "tiebreaking move" employed by Israel in the current conflict, unlike all previous rounds of fighting in the Strip".

Of what are we talking here??

This clearly is not about avoiding collateral civilian deaths occurring as the IDF battles with Hamas. There have been no street battles in Jabalia, or in and around the hospitals - as one soldier commented: "All we have done is ride around in our armored vehicles. The boots on the ground stuff will come later". The pretext of a "humanitarian evacuation" therefore is bogus.

Hamas main forces are sitting deep underground, for the right moment to engage the IDF (i.e. when they are on foot amidst the rubble). For now, the IDF are staying in their tanks. But sooner or later, they will have to engage with Hamas on foot. So, the fight with Hamas has barely begun.

Israeli soldiers complain that they "barely see" Hamas fighters. Well, that is because they are not present at street level, except in one or two-man raiding parties that exit the underground tunnels to attach an explosive device to a tank, or to fire a rocket at it. The Hamas operatives then quickly return to the tunnel from which they emerged. Some tunnels are constructed only for this purpose - as "once and done" structures. As soon as the raiding soldier returns, the tunnel is collapsed so that Israeli forces cannot enter or follow. New "throw-away" tunnels are continually being constructed.

You will not find any Hamas fighters in the Gaza civil hospitals either; their own hospital is in the main facilities deep underground (along with dormitories, stores to last several months, armouries and excavating equipment to dig new tunnels}. And the Hamas cadre is not to be found in the basements of the main Gaza hospitals.

Haaretz defence correspondent, Amos Harel, writes that Israel is only now coming to understand the scope and sophistication of the underground Hamas facilities. He acknowledges that the "military brass" - unlike the cabinet circles - "is not talking about eradicating the seed of Amalek" (a biblical reference to the extermination of the Amalek people) - i.e. genocide. But even the IDF military leaders are not sure about their "end-purpose", he notes.

So, the Elephant in the room for inhabitants of the Middle East - watching the destruction of the above-ground, civil structure - is what exactly is the objective of this killing? Hamas are deep below the ground. And although the IDF claims many successes, where are the bodies? We do not see them. The bombing therefore must be to force an evacuation of civilians - a second Nakba.

And the intent lying behind the expulsion? Benn says it is to create a sense that they will never return home:

"Even if some cease-fire is soon declared under United States of American pressure, Israel will be in no hurry to withdraw and allow the population to return to the northern Strip. And if they do come back - what will they come back to?? After all, they will have no homes, streets, educational institutions, shops or any of the infrastructure of a modern city".

Is this punishment on Gazas civilian population, prompted by desire for vengeance? Or is it an outpouring of eschatological rage and determination?

No one can say!!

This is the "Elephant". And on its clarification hangs the issue of whether the United States too will be tainted by a crime. On this clarification, hangs whether some sustained diplomatic accommodation can be found, or not (if Israel is indeed returning to Biblical, eschatological root-justification).

It is this issue which will come to haunt Biden personally, and the West collectively in the future.

Whatever timeline President Biden may have had in mind, time is rapidly slipping away from him, amid rising international outrage, as the focus of the Israel-Gaza conflict is now primarily centred around Gazas humanitarian crisis, and no longer the 7 October attack.

It may seem implausible, yet Gaza, with an area of only 360 sq. kms is determining our global geo-politics. This sliver of land - Gaza - also, to an extent, controls what comes next.

"We will not stop", Netanyahu has said; "there will be no ceasefire". Whilst, in the White House, an Administration insider admits:

"They are watching a train wreck, and they can not do anything about it. The train wreck is in Gaza, but the explosion is in the region. They know [they can not] actually stop the Israelis from what they are doing".

Time is running out. And this precisely is the obverse side to the "elephant paradox". But how much time is there before time runs out? That is a moot question.

This obverse side to the conundrum appears to have caused confusion in the West, and in Israel too. Did Seyed Nasrallahs speech last Sunday lower the risk of war widening beyond Israel, and thus imply that "time" might be more flexible, and give more space for White House deconflicting? Or did it send a different message?

Just to be clear: It did answer the question of whether WW3 was about break-out. Nasrallah was clear that full regional war is not sought by any member of the united resistance front. Yet "all options remain on the table", contingent upon United States and Israel future moves, Nasrallah underlined.

The following context to Nasrallahs address is vital to its full understanding. On this occasion, uniquely, his speech reflected wide consultation amongst all axis "fronts". There were, in short, multiple consultations and inputs to its final shape. The address therefore did not reflect the singularity of Hizbullahs position alone. This is why it is possible to say there is a consensus against rushing headlong into all-out regional war.

The address, as a composite work, was highly nuanced - which might account for some mis-conceptualisations. As usual, the MSM just wanted "the key takeaway". So, "Hizbullah did not declare war" became the easy, to-hand "take-away".

The first essential point from Seyed Nasrallahs address nonetheless, was that he effectively made Hizbullah the "guarantor" of Hamas survival (specifically, identifying Hamas by name, rather than referring to "the resistance" as a generic entity).

Hizbullah therefore restricts itself, for the interim, to (undefined) and limited operations on the Lebanese border environs - so long as Hamas survival is not at risk. The Party nonetheless promises to directly intervene in some way, should Hamas survival be imperilled.

This is a "red line" that will worry the White House. Clearly, Netanyahus objective of the extirpation of Hamas runs directly counter to Hizbullahs "red line", and risks the direct engagement of Hizbullah.

However, the "strategic shift" in this key policy statement on behalf of the full Axis is the shift to perceiving United States foreign policy in the Middle East as keystone to the Regions ills.

Instead of perceiving Israel as author of the present crisis, the latter was down-graded by Nasrallah, from independent actor, to that of being but one United States military protectorate, among others.

In plain terms, Seyed Nasrallah directly challenged not just the occupation of Palestine, but the United States in the round, as ultimately at the root of what has befallen the region - from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq to Palestine. In some respects, in this respect, Nasrallah echoed President Putins 2007 Munich warning to a West which was in the process of massing NATO forces on Russias borders. Putins riposte at that time was: "Challenge accepted".

So too, as the United States masses significant naval marine forces around the Region - to "deter Hizbullah and Iran" - but the latter declined to be deterred. Nasrallah said of the United States warships: "We have prepared for them something" (and later in week the Party unveiled its shore-to-ship missile capabilities).

The bottom line is that a united front of states and armed actors are warning of a wider challenge to United States hegemony. They effectively are saying, "Challenge accepted" too.

Their demand is clear: Stop the killing of civilians; stop the attacks and bring about a ceasefire. No expulsions; no new Nakba. In specific terms, the United States was warned to "expect pain" if the attack on Gaza is not quickly stopped. How much time is left to bring this cessation about (if it is even possible)? There are no timeline specifics.

What is meant by "pain"??

That is not clear!!

But look around: the Houthis are sending waves of cruise missiles aimed at Israel (some do not make it and are shot down; how many is unknown.) United States bases in Iraq are regularly (currently daily) under attack; many United States of American soldiers have been injured. And Hizbullah and Israel are, for now, in limited war across the Lebanese border.

Not all out war - but if Israels attacks on Gaza continue over the coming week(s), we should expect a managed escalatory tightening of the screw across different fronts - which of course risks slipping out of control!!

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.