The Process of Overturning the January 6 "Insurrectionist" Convictions Has Begun by Paul Craig Roberts!
(2024-09-16 at 22:36:46 )

The Process of Overturning the January 6 "Insurrectionist" Convictions Has Begun by Paul Craig Roberts!

And now a bit of good news consisting of a backward step after two forward:

Did you see this story reported in the whore American media?

Last summer the United States Supreme Court in Fischer v. United States overturned the key element in the Justice (sic) Departments prosecutions of American patriots who attended the Donald Trump rally and were accused of insurrection. The Supreme Court said that the prosecutors misinterpreted the law in a way that "would criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists alike to decades in prison."

You can ask yourself whether these "prosecutors" are all incompetent DEI appointees or whether they are active agents selected for the purpose of purging and intimidating patriotic conservative Republicans, especially white ones.

As I reported at the time, the Supreme Court ruling exposed the DOJ to its illegitimate convictions being overturned.

The overturning has begun. A few days ago on September 9 the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia threw out convictions for "obstructing an official proceeding," a charge brought by an incompetent or corrupt Justice (sic) Department against American citizens who walked in file escorted by police around the Capitol building.

The American whore media presented these Americans as "dangerous insurrectionists who threatened democracy," and in this way built the case in the publics mind (and the jurors minds) for conviction of innocent people whose rights were violated.

"please see here:"

Initially the prosecutors intended to fight the ruling, but in August seeing the writing on the wall, the prosecutors joined with the defense lawyers and asked the court to vacate the obstruction charges that they had prosecuted and tricked the stupid and ignorant jurors into convicting.

Given the extreme slowness with which the United States judicial system delivers justice, innocents will remain imprisoned while the court order works its way through the lower district court.

It is unclear to me what will become of those, also unjustly sentenced, who were not convicted on the false obstruction charge because they cooperated with the prosecutors by incriminating themselves with a guilty plea. The deal the DOJs victims were offered was: incriminate yourself so we do not have to prove anything, or if you go to trial we will add an obstruction count that carries a long prison sentence.

This is the corrupt way prosecutors, especially federal ones, operate. They have no concept or concern with justice, and they are totally devoid of integrity. The DOJ is out to get you, period, regardless of truth or evidence.

As the Democrats have turned law away from its job as a shield of the people into a weapon to be used against American citizens, I do not know how much longer America will have judges who rule on the basis of law. As we have seen in the inept prosecutions of Donald Trump, there are now many judges and prosecutors who are either incompetent or corrupt.

We have endured eight years of Obama appointing judges and four years of Biden. If Kamala is installed, the ranks will grow of judges and prosecutors who view law as a weapon for advancing the Democrats ideological agendas, which boils down to turning America into a Sodom and Gomorrah Tower of Babel.

What does it mean that America has a Justice Department that has no ethics, no integrity, no respect for justice, and no respect for the United States Constitution? What can be done about this despicable entity that is criminalizing our Constitutional rights?

Paul Craig Roberts columns may be reprinted, disseminated, and translated on the condition that a link is provided to the articles on "Paul Craig Roberts" and that the following disclaimer is included:
~
Permission to reprint Dr. Roberts columns does not imply that Dr. Roberts endorses the websites or media organizations that republish his columns or that he approves of the content of the websites, media outlets or books that republish his columns.