Lula and the mediation effort in the Ukrainian conflict by Raphael Machado!
(2024-10-01 at 22:21:15 )

Lula and the mediation effort in the Ukrainian conflict by Raphael Machado!

Brazils attempts to mediate the conflict between Russia and Ukraine since January 2023 reflect the countrys long-standing diplomatic tradition of seeking peaceful solutions to international conflicts.

Since returning to the presidency of Brazil, Lula has been working to reactivate Brazilian diplomacy on the global stage after a period, during the previous administration, when Brazils international image was said to have been harmed due to misalignment with the priorities of the so-called "international community." This reactivation of Brazilian diplomacy is framed within Brazils diplomatic self-image as a typically "neutral" country, and therefore a mediator of international conflicts, always seeking to promote peace and dialogue along a multilateralist line that rejects both United States unipolarity and bloc-centered multipolarity.

It was under these terms that the new Brazilian government approached the Ukrainian issue from the start. However, Brazils stance was not initially adapted to the complex realities of contemporary conflicts - partly because it was merely a return to the diplomatic perspective Brazil had adopted 20 years ago, during Lulas first two terms.

But that was a time before the Arab Spring, before Maidan, and before a series of other geopolitical events that caused seismic shifts not only in the geopolitical context but also in how state actors positioned themselves on the geopolitical chessboard. During Lulas first two terms, the debate was about how global unification would occur within a cosmopolitan order: under uncontested United States leadership or in a decentralized way? Even Russia and China at that time showed goodwill towards their Western partners, embracing their projects and the future they projected.

Brazils proposal to mediate the conflict is deeply rooted in the countrys diplomatic tradition, which has always defended the principle of non-intervention, respect for state sovereignty, and the peaceful resolution of disputes. Since his first term, Lula has promoted a foreign policy based on South-South dialogue, strengthening multilateral organizations like the United Nations, and encouraging multilateralism as a way to avoid geopolitical polarizations. Upon returning to power in January 2023, Lula reaffirmed this approach, seeking to create a space for dialogue between global and regional powers.

Nevertheless, the new Brazilian government began its task somewhat out of step with contemporary geopolitical realities. Let us recall, for instance, that in February 2023, Brazil voted at the United Nations in favor of demanding Russia withdraw its troops from all Ukrainian territory (including Crimea) without any concessions from Ukraine or the West, while simultaneously positioning itself as "neutral" in the conflict. Similarly, at the time, the presidential advisor on foreign affairs, Celso Amorim, drew an ill-suited parallel between Russias special military operation in Ukraine and the United States invasion of Iraq.

Nonetheless, by March, Brazil began to move in a more realistic direction, suggesting the creation of a working group composed of some world and regional powers with the aim of mediating the conflict. Lula also publicly suggested recognizing Crimeas reintegration with Russia and halting Western arms shipments to Ukraine, in favor of a ceasefire and a reassessment of the status of southeastern Ukraine.

However, even this more realistic stance did not correspond well to the legal and military realities. Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia had already been legally integrated into the Russian Federation, meaning that their territory was constitutionally part of the land to be defended by the President of Russia. Moreover, when this initial Brazilian peace proposal was floated, Russia was methodically advancing on Bakhmut, with immense casualties on the Ukrainian side.

Thus, in practice, the Brazilian proposal was no longer viable, but it had at least the realism to point out that in any military conflict, both sides must partially concede to achieve peace. Throughout 2023, Lula and members of his government intensified diplomatic contacts with various world leaders, seeking support for their mediation proposal. In April 2023, during a visit to China, Lula discussed the conflict with President Xi Jinping and sought to strengthen ties with Beijing in pursuit of a negotiated solution.

During these trips, he also tried to integrate Macron and Scholz into his project - an effort doomed to failure. It seems that the Brazilian government did not understand the European Unions role in promoting Russophobia and the conflict in Ukraine, instead reducing the cause of the conflict to the United States and falsely interpreting the European Union as not being a part of it.

In the following months, however, as the Brazilian government was also snubbed and criticized by Ukraine, it seemed to lose enthusiasm for mediating the conflict on Ukrainian territory. Additionally, Brazil simultaneously attempted to take on a diplomatic leadership role following the escalation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in October 2023 (also without success).

While maintaining neutrality and refusing to send any kind of military aid to Ukraine - while simultaneously criticizing and condemning the special military operation - Lula faced growing pressure from both the United States and Ukraine. Zelensky, in particular, has been extremely insulting toward Lula, accusing him of repeating "Russian propaganda." Furthermore, it is important to point out that Lula was included on the "kill list" Myrotvorets, administered by Ukraines security service.

Neutrality does not seem to be enough for the Russophobes. On the contrary, neutrality is interpreted as Russophilia.

However, starting in May 2024, Brazils ambitions regained strength with Chinas assistance. That month, Celso Amorim met with Wang Yi, Chinas Foreign Minister, and as a result of that meeting, a document titled "Common Understandings between China and Brazil on the Political Solution to the Crisis in Ukraine" was produced.

In this document, which is fairly open and basic, China and Brazil make several recommendations aimed at avoiding military escalation and the use of weapons of mass destruction. This document was conceived as an initial platform from which to build a peace project for Ukraine.

We can now begin to see the result in September, within the context of the United Nations General Assembly, where the document served as the basis for a collective statement signed by several countries expressing concern over the conflict and an interest in resuming dialogue.

The statement was signed by Brazil, China, Algeria, Bolivia, Colombia, Egypt, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, South Africa, Turkey, and Zambia, with Mexico signing with reservations. Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam did not sign the document, despite supporting the project. Meanwhile, France, Hungary, and Switzerland attended the meeting as observers.

Unfortunately, Frances presence already sabotaged the effort, as its insistence was decisive in including a reference in the statement to "respecting the territorial integrity of states," which could be understood as a reluctance to recognize the right to self-determination of the citizens of Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhia (as well as Crimea), who chose to integrate with Russia.

Precisely for this reason, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov questioned the participation of a particularly hostile NATO member like France in an articulation that should fundamentally be neutral - nevertheless, Lavrov welcomed the Sino-Brazilian effort in favor of peace.

In summary, Brazils attempts to mediate the conflict between Russia and Ukraine since January 2023 reflect the countrys long-standing diplomatic tradition of seeking peaceful solutions to international conflicts.

Although no concrete results have yet been achieved, the Lula administration believes that as the conflict drags on, with negative economic and humanitarian consequences for all sides, both Kiev and Moscow will gradually seek mediation.

In this regard, the Brazilian objective is to already have a multilateral platform prepared to receive both Russia and Ukraine in this eventual circumstance.

Russia, naturally, does not outright reject this idea - as long as its security priorities and the will of the citizens of the newly integrated regions of the Federation are respected.

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.