Tulsi Gabbard, the new United States intel chief.. a brave call to debunk NATOs war propaganda in Ukraine
(2024-11-17 at 00:05:08 )

Tulsi Gabbard, the new United States intel chief.. a brave call to debunk NATOs war propaganda in Ukraine

Tulsi Gabbard can provide the necessary counsel to Donald Trump upon which a lasting peace settlement can be made.

The nomination of Tulsi Gabbard as the United States intelligence supremo has sent shockwaves through the American and NATO establishments. The Western news media - always a dutiful echo chamber for deep-state policymakers - is reverberating with horror at her nomination by President-elect Donald Trump.

That reaction is a good sign that something significant has happened.

The potential appointment of Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) could be the most consequential decision yet by Donald Trump in forming his cabinet.

If one move could signal the foreign policy direction under the 47th president, Ms Gabbards nomination is the most salient and potentially the most constructive on the key issue of world peace.

Time magazine headlined with the United States intelligence communitys response to Ms Gabbards selection. "We are reeling," it was reported. Reuters reported that the Western "spy world is vexed." Meanwhile, in The Atlantic, an establishment mouthpiece, Ms Gabbard was denounced as a "threat to the security of the United States."

That is a staggering charge to levy on the person who is going to be head of national security.

It is almost hilarious to see the apoplectic reaction in the United States establishment and its servile mainstream media.

CNNs news anchor Jim Sciutto was distraught in sharing his concerns with colleague Richard Quest, remarking that Ms Gabbards views "contradict" almost everything about United States foreign policies.

If we may paraphrase that exchange, the sentiments were: Oh my God, how terrible! Whatever shall we say now about all the lies we have been spinning for years and getting fat salaries for?

After all, as far as the United States corporate media are concerned, especially those channels and newspapers associated with the Democrats, the establishment, and the deep state intelligence apparatus, Tulsi Gabbard has been smeared as a ?Russian asset."

It is indeed profoundly challenging - one might even say, earth-shattering - to the deep state if Ms Gabbard becomes Director of National Intelligence.

As with Donald Trumps other cabinet picks, the nominations will have to be approved by Senate panels. So there is a while to go before her post is confirmed. A lot can change or be derailed.

Donald Trumps cabinet picks this week have been keenly watched by observers trying to discern the future foreign policies of the next presidency, which begins in January after his inauguration. Donald Trumps early call-ups this week of hawkish figures Pete Hegseth for defense and Marco Rubio for secretary of state caused dismay among some critics of United States foreign policy who wanted a fundamental break from warmongering and hostility toward Russia, China, and Iran, among others.

Then came Donald Trumps selection of Tulsi Gabbard. The former Congresswoman has gained wide popular American and international respect for her outspoken and independent criticism of United States militarism in the Middle East and Ukraine.

However, the United States political establishment and media have slandered her as a "traitor" and a "Russian asset" for her views criticizing Washington,D.C.s regime change wars in Syria and the Middle East. In 2017, Ms Gabbard traveled to Syria and met with President Bashar al-Assad. She spoke out against Washington,D.C.s covert policy of sponsoring terrorist militia for regime change in Damascus. For telling the truth, she was vilified as an "apologist" for Assad.

More recently, the "apologist" slur was thrown at her again after Ms Gabbard opposed the United States and NATOs arming of the Kiev regime and the proxy war against Russia. She said that the conflict in Ukraine could have been avoided if Russias security concerns about NATOs threatening expansion had been taken into consideration. How refreshing to hear that sanity and objectivity.

In a twisted way, the CNN clapping seals are correct. Her views on the conflict in Ukraine do indeed contradict the United States establishment and medias propaganda about "Russian aggression." Her views unequivocally debunk the wall-to-wall "news" propaganda as false and serve as a warning to the public that NATOs lies are dragging the world into a nuclear war.

The role of Tulsi Gabbard in the second Trump administration - if she makes it through Senate vetting - cannot be overstated.

In her DNI capacity, she is the intel supremo who oversees the CIA and NSA. Through her daily briefings to the president, Ms Gabbard will play a crucial role in President Trumps foreign policymaking. Given Trumps freewheeling style, it can be fairly assumed that Ms Gabbards input into policymaking will have much greater influence than the secretaries of defense or state. She will call the shots, and Donald Trump will designate Hegseth, Rubio, and others to follow suit on the policies.

Some critics of Ms Gabbard have pointed out that she is unduly supportive of Israel. That is a valid concern.

Nevertheless, in relations with Russia, China, and Iran, Ms Gabbard has been a trenchant and tenacious voice of reason. She has courageously advocated peaceful negotiations and diplomacy along with historical understanding as a way to avoid military conflicts. Her reasonable emphasis on diplomacy illustrates just how extremist the United States "mainstream" has become in its promotion of wars and more wars.

Ms Gabbard is a veteran of the Iraq War and appears to have been deeply affected by the human cost of wars. She has repeatedly condemned endless wars that are endemic to United States imperialism. Her honesty in criticizing the failings and faults of American policy, calling it out often as criminal, is admirable.

She quit the Democrat party in 2022, condemning it for its relentless warmongering policies. She endorsed Donald Trump for the White House because, she said, he would prevent World War Three by stopping the reckless proxy war in Ukraine.

President-elect Donald Trump has said that he wants to end the conflict in Ukraine as one of his priorities.

Some commentators have expressed skepticism about the chances of Donald Trump making a peace settlement in Ukraine. Even senior Russian figures have said they do not expect significant change in United States policy.

Still, Russia has clearly stated that it is open to dialogue and diplomacy. Moscow has said it will respond positively to Trumps outreach. And Donald Trump is reported to be ready to appoint an envoy of credible stature to explore a peaceful solution in Ukraine.

Now, there is the rub. Russia is adamant that its conditions for peaceful settlement must involve its original objectives: no Ukraine membership of Ukraine, denazification of the Kiev regime, and acceptance of realities on the ground, meaning recognition of Russias regained historical territories.

Russia will not accept a frozen conflict, and given the rapid military advances it is making against the NATO-backed regime, Moscow is in a position to fully demand its terms.

If Donald Trump is serious about finding a peaceful resolution, he will have to accept Russias terms. That will require an understanding of how that conflict started and how to reverse it. No bluster, no bravado, and certainly no browbeating Russia.

Tulsi Gabbard can provide the necessary counsel to Donald Trump upon which a lasting peace settlement can be made because she understands the history of that conflict and has debunked the false propaganda that the United States establishment, the Democrats, some Republicans, and the corporate media have peddled for far too long.

In the meantime, Russia must advance towards its righteous goals in Ukraine. And right now, the best contribution to peace is to defeat the corrupt Nazi regime in Kiev in short order.

"This relevant article, its pictures, and its links are here:"

Reprinted here from the "Strategic Culture Foundation" provides a platform for exclusive analysis, research and policy comment on Eurasian and global affairs. We are covering political, economic, social and security issues worldwide. Since 2005 our journal has published thousands of analytical briefs and commentaries with the unique perspective of independent contributors. SCF works to broaden and diversify expert discussion by focusing on hidden aspects of international politics and unconventional thinking. Benefiting from the expanding power of the Internet, we work to spread reliable information, critical thought and progressive ideas.