The Reason For Killing Iranians By Jacob G. Hornberger!!!!
(2018-11-19 at 14:07:49 )

The Reason for Killing Iranians by Jacob G. Hornberger

While United States sanctions technically permit Iran to import medicines, it is actually just a ruse to make it look like United States officials are kind, compassionate, and benevolent.

In actuality, the way the sanctions work will mean that the Iranian people will inevitably be deprived of much-needed medicines. That is because the United States extends its sanctions system to banks that process payments to Iran, which is likely to inhibit the importation of medicines into Iran.

But that is the point behind the sanctions: to kill as many Iranians as possible in the hope that they will rise up in a violent revolution, oust Irans anti-United States regime from power, and install another pro-United States regime, like that of the Shah of Iran, who the Central Intelligence Agency installed into power in its 1953 coup that destroyed Irans experiment with democracy.

Never mind that the Iranians, who live in a country that has strict gun control, lack the means to violently overthrow their government.

And never mind that hundreds of thousands of Iranians would likely die in such a revolution, just like what has happened in the United States-supported revolution in Syria.

Those deaths would not matter to United States officials. They would be considered "worth it," especially if they brought a pro-United States regime into power in Iran.

Recall that those were the words that United States Ambassador to the United Nations used back in 1996, when the United States government was enforcing sanctions against Iraq.

The Iraq sanctions had already killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children.

The idea was that if Iraqi parents became sufficiently upset with their children dying, they would oust their dictator, Saddam Hussein, from power and replace him with a pro-United States dictator.

After some six years of deaths of Iraqi children, however, the sanctions had still not produced the desired result.

Saddam was still in power. The CBS news program "Sixty Minutes" asked Ms Albright if the sanctions were worth it.

She replied that the sanctions were, in fact, worth it.

She was expressing the official position of the Clinton administration. That is because killing those Iraqi children was viewed in the same way as killing Iranians today: as a means by which a pro-United States regime could be installed into power.

One of the ironies of the Iraq sanctions is that in the previous decade, United States officials had partnered with Saddam, even furnishing him those infamous Weapons of Mass Destruction that would later serve as the bogus excuse for invading Iraq in 2001. (See "here" and "here".)

Why was the United States government partnering in the 1980s with Saddam, the man they would try to oust from power in the 1990s by killing Iraqi children?

They were helping him kill Iranians in the war that he had started against Iran. United States officials were so angry that the Iranian people had ousted the Central Intelligence Agency-installed Shah in their 1979 revolution that they decided to use Saddam in the 1980s to exact their revenge by helping him to kill Iranians.

What United States officials did to an American man named Bert Sacks serves as a valuable lesson for anyone, including banks who process payments, who tries to help the Iranian people.

Sachs believed that the sanctions were a moral abomination.

He was not the only one.

Three high officials in the United Nations resigned their positions in a crisis of conscience against what was considered by some to be a United States genocide against Iraqi children.

Mr. Sacks decided to take medicines into Iraq, and United States officials went after him with a vengeance.

They fined him $10,000 and then spent about a decade trying to collect the fine, which Mr. Sachs, to his everlasting credit, refused to pay. (See: "Sacks")

It is no different, of course, with the United States sanctions on North Korea and the decades-old, Cold War-era United States embargo on Cuba.

The idea is to kill as many North Koreans and Cubans as possible in the hopes that they will finally rise up in a violent revolution and oust their dictatorial regimes from power.

No number of deaths is considered too high.

They are all considered worth it.

Meanwhile, many sanctions supporters continue to go to church on Sundays and pat themselves on the back for living in a country whose government is kind, compassionate, and benevolent.

Printed here with permission from Mr. Jacob G. Hornberger of The Future of Freedom Foundation!! Their Great Website!!